California Proposal for State-run Retirement Plan for Private-sector Workers Moves Forward
The proposed California Secure Choice Retirement Plan essentially would be a 401(k) plan operated by the state and open to private-sector workers whose employers don’t offer a retirement savings plan.
California has taken a step closer to becoming the first state to make retirement savings accounts a near-universal benefit for workers with a plan that lawmakers hope will help ease an expected massive shortfall in retirement savings.
A state board Monday sent a set of recommendations to the Legislature calling for the creation of the California Secure Choice Retirement Plan — essentially a 401(k) plan operated by the state and open to private-sector workers whose employers don't offer a retirement savings plan.
The proposed California Secure Choice Retirement Plan essentially would be a 401(k) plan operated by the state and open to private-sector workers whose employers don’t offer a retirement savings plan.
California has taken a step closer to becoming the first state to make retirement savings accounts a near-universal benefit for workers with a plan that lawmakers hope will help ease an expected massive shortfall in retirement savings.
A state board Monday sent a set of recommendations to the Legislature calling for the creation of the California Secure Choice Retirement Plan — essentially a 401(k) plan operated by the state and open to private-sector workers whose employers don't offer a retirement savings plan.
Employees of any company with at least five workers would be eligible to participate. That would cover an estimated 6.8 million workers, about a third of California's labor force. The plan calls for eligible workers to be signed up automatically by their employers and have 2% to 5% of their wages invested in the plan, unless workers opt out.
Business groups have questioned whether the plan could cost employers or make them liable for investment losses or other problems. But state officials have said the retirement plans would be similar to those available to many private-sector employees and, unlike pension plans for state workers, would not be funded or guaranteed by employers or taxpayers.
Retirement savings advocates say the kind of state-run retirement accounts being considered by California and a handful of other states could help millions of Americans — especially lower-income workers, who are the least likely to save — put away at least a small retirement nest egg.
The National Institute on Retirement Security estimates that about 45% of private-sector workers are not offered a retirement savings plan through their employer. And though workers without an employer-sponsored plan can create individual retirement accounts and other savings plans on their own, AARP estimates that only about 5% of such workers do so. That has led to growing concerns of a looming retirement crisis, as large numbers of baby boomers move into their retirement years without traditional pensions with fixed monthly payments.
The Secure Choice Retirement Plan has been in the works since 2012, when state Sen. Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) wrote a bill calling for the creation of a board to look into the feasibility of a state-run retirement plan for private workers. The Secure Choice Retirement Savings Investment Board created by De León's this bill recommended that the Legislature require employees be enrolled in the program automatically, though they could choose not to participate. The idea is that workers are much more likely to save for retirement if that's the path of least resistance. "It begins to put in the minds of many people that savings can be automatic," said Blanca Castro of AARP, which supports the plan.
The board's recommendations will now be incorporated into a bill that De León introduced last month. Similar proposals are under consideration in Oregon, Illinois, Connecticut and other states, though publicly run retirement plans are not yet open for business in any state.
De León's 2012 bill setting the retirement plan in motion passed along party lines and was signed by Gov. Jerry Brown. His new bill incorporating the board's recommendations, SB 1234, will have its first hearing in the Senate Committee on Public Employment and Retirement on April 22. De León said he hopes that his bill will pass by July, allowing it to become law in January. Still, there are plenty of details to be hashed out and the plan could be more than a year away from investing money on workers' behalf.
"We have lot of figuring out to do," said Christina Elliott, acting executive director of the Secure Choice investment board. "Clearly we won't be enrolling on Jan. 1, 2017."
A key issue will be where to park workers' contributions. The board recommended that the retirement plan initially invest in U.S. Treasury bonds or other ultra-safe investments while officials study whether other types of securities — mutual funds, for instance — should be made available.
There's also the question of how money will be taken from workers' checks and how their investments will be managed.
Elliott said the goal is to minimize employers' role in the process. They'll be responsible for enrolling workers in the program and deducting money from their checks, then passing that money along to the board.
The board, in turn, will hire a third-party investment firm — think 401(k) giants Vanguard Group or Fidelity Investments — to manage that money. The state plan could be big business for an investment manager. Overture Financial estimated that the average worker eligible for the plan makes about $35,000 a year, and that at least 70% of eligible workers would participate. If most workers save about 3% of their income, that represents about $5 billion in assets after just the first year.
Other questions to be sorted out include whether workers will be able to take money out of the plan before retirement age and how the funds will be distributed once they do retire.
_________________________________________________________________________
Information from an article by James Rufus Koren, a contract writer for the Los Angeles Times as published by the CalChamber.
Business groups have questioned whether the plan could cost employers or make them liable for investment losses or other problems. But state officials have said the retirement plans would be similar to those available to many private-sector employees and, unlike pension plans for state workers, would not be funded or guaranteed by employers or taxpayers.
Retirement savings advocates say the kind of state-run retirement accounts being considered by California and a handful of other states could help millions of Americans — especially lower-income workers, who are the least likely to save — put away at least a small retirement nest egg.
The National Institute on Retirement Security estimates that about 45% of private-sector workers are not offered a retirement savings plan through their employer. And though workers without an employer-sponsored plan can create individual retirement accounts and other savings plans on their own, AARP estimates that only about 5% of such workers do so. That has led to growing concerns of a looming retirement crisis, as large numbers of baby boomers move into their retirement years without traditional pensions with fixed monthly payments.
The Secure Choice Retirement Plan has been in the works since 2012, when state Sen. Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) wrote a bill calling for the creation of a board to look into the feasibility of a state-run retirement plan for private workers. The Secure Choice Retirement Savings Investment Board created by De León's this bill recommended that the Legislature require employees be enrolled in the program automatically, though they could choose not to participate. The idea is that workers are much more likely to save for retirement if that's the path of least resistance. "It begins to put in the minds of many people that savings can be automatic," said Blanca Castro of AARP, which supports the plan.
The board's recommendations will now be incorporated into a bill that De León introduced last month. Similar proposals are under consideration in Oregon, Illinois, Connecticut and other states, though publicly run retirement plans are not yet open for business in any state.
De León's 2012 bill setting the retirement plan in motion passed along party lines and was signed by Gov. Jerry Brown. His new bill incorporating the board's recommendations, SB 1234, will have its first hearing in the Senate Committee on Public Employment and Retirement on April 22. De León said he hopes that his bill will pass by July, allowing it to become law in January. Still, there are plenty of details to be hashed out and the plan could be more than a year away from investing money on workers' behalf.
"We have lot of figuring out to do," said Christina Elliott, acting executive director of the Secure Choice investment board. "Clearly we won't be enrolling on Jan. 1, 2017."
A key issue will be where to park workers' contributions. The board recommended that the retirement plan initially invest in U.S. Treasury bonds or other ultra-safe investments while officials study whether other types of securities — mutual funds, for instance — should be made available.
There's also the question of how money will be taken from workers' checks and how their investments will be managed.
Elliott said the goal is to minimize employers' role in the process. They'll be responsible for enrolling workers in the program and deducting money from their checks, then passing that money along to the board.
The board, in turn, will hire a third-party investment firm — think 401(k) giants Vanguard Group or Fidelity Investments — to manage that money. The state plan could be big business for an investment manager. Overture Financial estimated that the average worker eligible for the plan makes about $35,000 a year, and that at least 70% of eligible workers would participate. If most workers save about 3% of their income, that represents about $5 billion in assets after just the first year.
Other questions to be sorted out include whether workers will be able to take money out of the plan before retirement age and how the funds will be distributed once they do retire.
_________________________________________________________________________
Information from an article by James Rufus Koren, a contract writer for the Los Angeles Times as published by the CalChamber.
RSS Feed
